Today is Boxing Day. CBC had a special report this morning. Their roving holiday reporter had a direct report from Canada Customs. Santa got busted at the Border. Papers were not quite right, and there was a six-hour delay. Back at The Pole Mrs. Claus fretted. All Canada lent support (and complained about Customs.)
G-G’s IS open for a post-Christmas sale. The whole town is lined up outside and inside – except for one family; they are keeping Vigil at the Hospital. We’re about to lose another Elder. The wedding is lurching towards completion. Right now the rehearsal is on for 6 pm tonight and the Wedding for 3 pm tomorrow; and lots of cooks are frantic. Raymond is staying close to the Vigil, as well as to the family, which he knows well and which knows him well. I’m staying with the Wedding.
Some thoughts about Raymond and St. Thomas’
Raymond and I have shared all of this following material, often many times over in the past five months, although I am presenting it here in my own way. As I told Raymond, I’m not looking at Raymond so much as I am looking at that population amongst whom he labors.
Raymond was ordained to the Diaconate some years ago – as an intentional or permanent Deacon. That is, his ministry focus is distinct from that of a Priest. His ministry focus has related to those on the margins of this community – particularly those disabled by addiction. And they are many. For years The Hudson’s Bay Company employed him as Manager of the Meat Department. He was forced into early retirement by a physical difficulty – nerve damage to his right arm as a consequence of his work. In his retirement he has labored constantly in recovery programs with broken people. And he has served as a Deacon in The Church. His gift of compassion and insight is incredible.
Raymond is about my age. The Canons of The Church in Canada require us 60-year-old youngsters to retire from Church work at age 65. We may be at the height of our powers at that age, but we have to quit and make room for someone else. That means Raymond and I will probably disappear from St. Thomas’ at about the same time.
Raymond has lived on The Island for about 45 years. He met Marion, his wife of many years, here on The Island. In his younger days he was not exactly an Anglican Deacon. He came slowly and late in life to the Anglican Church. Early in life, he cut a fairly wide swath across The Island. But, he is one of those people who survived his youth, and he has grown powerfully throughout his entire life.
During the seven or so years of my predecessor the Priest called upon Raymond’s considerable abilities as pastor repeatedly. In retrospect this may not have been the best thing to do, but I am sure that no one then could have guessed at that. To all outward appearances, joining the Deacon’s and the Priest’s ministries into one powerful pastoral presence on The Island strengthened the work of the Church. All kinds of people really appreciated that effort. And many cannot understand why we haven’t put humpty-dumpty back together again – now that there is a new Priest on The Island.
The problems began to surface sometime after the departure of my predecessor. I now think that the issues were up and running well before he left. But they became unavoidable for Raymond some time between Priests. Raymond was certifiably burnt out when I arrived here in August. The problem, as I understand from Raymond’s telling of it, appeared when he was called upon to make pastoral interventions (weddings and burials) on top of everything else. But I don’t think that this time around he experienced just the kind of overload that occurs in churches – especially when there is one man standing and holding the bag. I think there’s more that was going on; and I think it’s going on now.
In his 45 years of being on this Island Raymond has come to know just about everyone. And he has labored greatly with the most fragile people on The Island. The Community has responded, indeed. He has been elected or appointed as a member of the Band. The Community has adopted him – an honor that certainly is rare and probably is unique. What happened?
Raymond has lived long enough in this Community to become absorbed by each family. In this sense he has grown into the role of the mission priest I described in last month’s journal. Never mind that he is a Deacon with a focus outside the immediate precincts of the Congregation. None of that matters in the traditional family structure. What matters is that he is known and trusted – that his history and the family’s history have become one in the same. He is not called upon to exercise spiritual powers so much as he is called upon for pastoral care. In the mind of the public he has become the best resource possible from the Church – or anywhere — for the vanished shaman. Even now, when there is trouble, people call Raymond. The presence of a new (white) cleric is irrelevant; the pastor/shaman is already here. And he is Raymond.
However, the client group – or family — served by that Deacon/Shaman/Holy Man does not total around 150-250 people, as it would in a traditional, semi-nomadic, ordinary family. It includes the entire Island — numbering 3,000 to 5,000 people. Raymond, in other words, has become the lightning rod for that incredible hunger in a culture that has lost both its capacity to express its need as well as its capacity to accommodate its need – beyond the helpful, though limited, ministrations of The Pastor. (My thesis, which I am testing in this Journal, is that the Anglican Pastor is a substitute for that previous indigenous shamanistic role.)
So there is enormous energy behind the call for The Pastor. But the pastoral relationship always is geared to help people through crises and difficult transitions. In five months (since August) I have never heard it described as relating in any significant way to spiritual or vocational growth, ministry focus, or maturation of discipleship. Healing, yes, especially in the recovery of those addicted as well as those suffering from disease, as well for the healing sought in bereavement. But that’s about it. It’s enough to get us through the day (when the practitioner can be found.) But it doesn’t quite work. The language and symbols of one culture are used as a substitute for the lost symbols of another culture; and they don’t quite fit. The closer you get to the core of the Parish, the closer the fit; the further you get from the core of the Parish, the less the symbols actually work. (That’s probably true universally; here, however, at least this one issue is specific.)
Of course, one way to describe all of this is to think in terms of an institutional chaplaincy. In this sense, we might be talking about a Chaplain to the Village or to The Island. There’s a large but specific population – 3-5 thousand people, all residents of Moose Factory. And, given the specificity of that population there predictably are issues that surface repeatedly. This is true in Hospitals, Prisons, Army Bases. The Chaplain/Pastor works with the folk to address those issues as they arise.
But there are some differences, also, between that Chaplaincy model and what is going on here. The population is static, rather than transient. The Chaplain/Pastor is related to families and individuals – maybe not always by blood but, rather, by something far more profound. In HIS mind he may experience some level of detachment. In the mind of client group, however, he is anything BUT detached. And, that, for the client group, is what is so important. He is a member of the family.
In any case this work has rarely, if ever, related to congregational development, personal growth (beyond the immediately presented issue) and responsibility, or issues involving spirituality, vocation, or stewardship. It might well be that Raymond would never have been adopted if he HAD raised any of those issues – however non-confrontively. Or he might have been rejected. And they are issues far more appropriately raised by a non-white; otherwise they could come across as part of an authoritarian harangue or cultural obtuseness. But except where/when they ARE addressed/processed, the future of St. Thomas’ remains in doubt.
Remedies – or a creative approach….
OK … So what are we going to do about this?
Raymond will retire from active ministry as a deacon in about five years. He realizes that if these present demands from the Community on his time, psyche, and being continue, he may well have to move off The Island just to be able to survive. He and I are talking about that. And we are beginning to talk about that with others. When I restrict his involvement in a wedding or funeral I am doing that (by mutual agreement) to protect him and to ease the transition whereby (in the Community’s mind) he is the point man for family transitions. Remember, this is the marginal population we are talking about. The core group of St. Thomas’ doesn’t behave this way.
One reason why the Anglicans are called upon so often by non churched people is that the other denominations are not nearly so accommodating and often simply refuse their services even when there has been a death or there will be a wedding.
So, St. Thomas’ needs to decide NOW if it wants to continue this ministry – and, if so, how? A diaconal cadre (whether formalized, ordained, or labeled as such) needs to be in formation now, if that work will continue after five years. (The work will continue regardless of what St. Thomas’ does. Communities have a way of raising up what they need when they need it. The question, then, more precisely, is whether St. Thomas’ wants to be involved in that work. If it is involved, it will have the opportunity to influence what happens. If it is not involved, it’s out of the loop.) To whatever extent St. Thomas’ is involved will be determined by what St. Thomas’ can afford in relationship to what St. Thomas’ is committed to. Decisions on all of that are irrelevant, if made by the (White) Priest alone. They are relevant if made by The Vestry only to the extent that The Vestry is thoroughly representative of the core Congregation. The effective decision, then, is the consensus of the Congregation.
This provokes the more basic set of questions: Who is St. Thomas’? And to what Mission IS St. Thomas’ committed?
Attendance figures this Christmas – with the two Christmas Eve Services along with the Christmas Day Service – ran to about 150 people. Holy Week Services seem to range between 20 and 35. The active Congregation is somewhere between those numbers. I don’t have a clear idea of the average age of that group. There are some younger folks and many Elders. Also, starting now, we are intentionally saving, whenever possible, the identities of those who support St. Thomas’ for future reference. It’s not WHAT the person gave that interests me. It’s WHO GIVES that is so important. In one sense this IS the Congregation. (Average pledge/contribution divided by number of givers – over a ten year period – would be really interesting information; but it’s not available.) In a third sense, the central core of the Congregation is that group of people present at the Celebration of New Ministry and the Workshop the night before. Anyway, most who call themselves ‘Anglican’ are not part of any Congregation in any meaningful sense. The days when one can identify oneself as ‘Anglican’ or by some other denomination and do nothing further in ones’ life to live into that identity are fast receding. In another generation those days will be gone.
The actual Congregation is very distinct from that larger marginalized population. And the Congregation has some very real and very specific needs. While it might take six to ten Deacons to cover the ground that Raymond covers, pastoring the Congregation involves significantly fewer people. And the project is qualitatively different. In the case of the Congregation, each person needs to be growing in his/her ministry. The days that any congregation can survive the passive participation of its constituency are rapidly ending.
I find my own energies focusing on this small core group. This is the group that needs to be nurtured and cultivated. Hopefully it will produce an indigenous priest. My dream is that my successor will be that priest – just as, perhaps, the diaconate also will indigenous. But the community of faith to which that (or any) leadership belongs needs an increased awareness of itself. Most of what – or how – I preach through the winter will come from that perspective.